T-shirt Database

Showing 0 of 0 garments

Final Rating 0.0 / 10 points

Engineering 0 / 100 max

Confidence 0% disclosure ratio

Weighted Breakdown

Fibre & Yarn Quality

0 /30

Knit & Dyeing Processing

0 /20

Geometry & Construction

0 /20

Stability & Finish resilience

0 /15

Manufacturer Disclosure

0 /15

Technical Specifications

Retail Pricing $0 AUD Fit / Cut Silhouette unspecified Fabric Composition unspecified Fiber unspecified Yarn (Count/Ply) unspecified Yarn Spinning Method unspecified Knit unspecified Garment Weight unspecified Country of Origin unspecified Side Seams Structure unspecified Shoulder Seam Position unspecified Rear Neck Structure unspecified Collar Rib / Recovery unspecified Shrinkage Treatment unspecified Last Audited Date unspecified

Anomalies & Red Flags

Evidence & Analyst Dissection

Analyst notes will be placed here.

Comparison

0 selected

Design & Scoring Philosophy

The scoring logic removes subjective "luxury feel" and marketing claims. A garment is evaluated as an industrial product of agriculture, spinning technology, and manufacturing construction.

A garment's final score is calculated out of 10. It is heavily weighted by three key pillars: Fiber & Yarn engineering, Knit & Stability processing, and Geometric assembly quality.

Sub-Score Weights

Each profile breaks down into five category scores that compound to create the Engineering Score (100 pts):

Dimension	Weight	Technical Parameters Evaluated
Fibre & Yarn	30%	Fibre staple length (Suvin, Pima, Egyptian), yarn ply (2-ply vs 1-ply), combed vs carded, compact spun, and yarn count.
Knit & Dyeing	20%	Knitting tension consistency, machinery class (loopwheel vs high-speed circular), dye penetration, and wash fastness.
Geometry & Construction	20%	Shoulder seam forward shifting, armhole height spacing, rear neck tape reinforcing, side seam integration (or loopwheel circular tubular drape).
Stability & Finishing	15%	Sanforization processing, pre-shrinking treatments, seam twisting resistance, and collar recovery resilience.
Manufacturer Disclosure	15%	Traceability disclosures regarding agricultural mill origin, spinning plant location, and sewing facility conditions.

Hard-Gate Penalties (Rejection Flags)

To prevent marketing-based inflation, the algorithm employs strict structural gates. A t-shirt is instantly flagged with a Hard Rejection and its Final Score capped if it fails any of the following parameters:

Synthetic Fiber Blends: High polyester/nylon content in the body fabric (excluding standard elastane ribbing reinforcement) lowers the score.
Open-End Carded Yarn: Short-staple open-end spinning produces structural weakness and a scratchy feel, indicating low-tier material.
Unstable Tubular Construction: Circular knit fabrics that bypass side seams without proper sanforization or skew correction, leading to significant twisting after washing.
Dry-Clean Only Labels: A t-shirt requiring dry cleaning indicates extreme fiber instability or fragile, chemical-heavy surface finishes.
Zero Transparencies & Claims: High-priced brand markup using "Premium Egyptian Cotton" claims without certificates, source mill listing, or factory verification.

Confidence & Transparency Scoring

The Confidence Score measures the ratio of verified, auditable data vs unverified claims. If a specification is unknown, it is explicitly disclosed as such. Unknown variables are never averaged upward or assumed to be positive; instead, they reduce the confidence score, which in turn dampens the value ranking.